![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtBrPk82TVN_LzRz2mR9Mvt_T-uUDLc7CTcWyVsttfVqZ_fgcgFHryfIAwxqXEmeiEh8DA9X2c4NuSS9W81h4_tWdBSISY4gKx2WD8HDEJa7J3H3-5_eWtZnHxYTecOimfhu-O/s400/Reverie.jpg)
Reverie
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiR0ZI7PEqQAlPwknWEtGuGfX0vc106JA8S86C3JDNAlfyJ_bQSHejHC29y7E6XZP-4MYVyX0Sms_9MDPZXdwzQkwmcjzBQDfp7p54KNOCyRmZ3jcjpuQr6WhC9OpVUoKb_FKSF/s400/Primer.jpg)
Primer
One film was full of color, depth of field, and all the other "filmic" pieces that make it a very artistic piece. The other looked like it was shot with a VHS camcorder that didn't have manual focus.
And while "Reverie" is fun to look at, I enjoyed my experience with "Primer" a whole lot more. Why?
Story.
"Primer" had one. Okay, "Reverie" has one too... but it's not very interesting. The images are interesting, but the story? Not really. "Primer" is a fascinating look at indie filmmaking. This piece was written, director, edited, and starred by one guy. He had a crew of five. And his movie went to the big screen and grossed over 60 times his budget.
That's good.
"Reverie"? A cool demonstration of the ability of a digital SLR to make pretty video clips.
There's absolutely a place for both, but as an independent filmmaker, I'd rather have "Primer" under my belt.
~Luke Holzmann
Your Media Production Mentor
No comments :
Post a Comment