tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13834166.post6604361056445201757..comments2009-07-10T18:18:24.650-06:00Lukehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07799632321310461828noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13834166.post-1809636021343778802009-07-10T18:18:24.650-06:002009-07-10T18:18:24.650-06:00And that is probably why I&#39;ve never been much impressed with the &quot;allure&quot; of 24P. I realize many people really, really like it. But for me, I like clarity and crispness in what I see unless the blur is for emotional effect. The &quot;film look&quot; (complete with jitter) mostly just annoys me, more than ever now that I&#39;ve see movies projected digitally.<br /><br />I realize that this is mostly aesthetic preference--and that I&#39;m likely very much in minority of those who can tell a difference at all--and you make excellent points. There are ways to get crisp 24P, but I find that in a lot of moving shots or quick motion everything falls apart... er... &quot;becomes dreamlike&quot; &lt;smile&gt;.<br /><br /> ~LukeLukehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07799632321310461828noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13834166.post-42177229829131706572009-07-10T09:06:30.452-06:002009-07-10T09:06:30.452-06:00I don&#39;t think the allure of 24p has ever been crisp images... it&#39;s been the slight blur, the dreamlike feel that you don&#39;t get in reality. It&#39;s what we&#39;ve been trained to accept as professional and how the art of film &#39;should look.&#39; Besides, if you want crisp 24p, just change the shutter speed/angle.<br /><br />-RyanRyanhttp://www.tlimono.comnoreply@blogger.com